Out of communal land: clientelism through delegation of agricultural tenancy contracts
![https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rumpin,_Bogor,_West_Java,_Indonesia_-_panoramio.jpg Photo by Kasman70 on Wikimedia Commons](https://acde.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/styles/anu_doublenarrow_440_220/public/events/images/2021-05/rumpin_bogor_west_java_indonesia_-_panoramio.jpg?itok=nl2As4x_)
Event details
ACDE Seminar
Date & time
Venue
Speaker
Contacts
Do local institutions influence the nature of political clientelist exchange? We find a positive answer in the context of a village institution prevalent in Java since the Dutch colonial rule, where democratically elected village heads receive usufruct rights over a piece of communal village land (bengkok land) as a compensation for their service in lieu of salary. To formulate how limited-term private ownership of bengkok land promotes clientelism, we model a timely delegation of agricultural tenancy contracts to villagers-cum-voters as an incumbent re-election strategy. Based on a household survey fielded in 2018 across 130 villages in Java, Indonesia, we find that the chances of a bengkok plot being rented out increase by 6 percentage points as the time of the next election becomes closer by one year, and sharecropping is preferred to a fixed-rental contract as the election approaches. The empirical results are statistically significant and remain largely unchanged against a series of robustness checks. We also find suggestive evidence of short-term efficiency loss from clientelist politics over bengkok land.
Updated: 15 August 2024/Responsible Officer: Crawford Engagement/Page Contact: CAP Web Team