Directed technical change and the British industrial revolution
![](https://acde.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/styles/anu_narrow_200_200/public/publication/images/acde_crawford_anu_edu_au/2020-12/td_working_paper_image_1_2_2.jpg?itok=q-EbM3DF)
We build a directed technical change model where one intermediate goods sector uses a fixed quantity of biomass energy (“wood”) and another uses coal at a fixed price, matching stylized facts for the British Industrial Revolution. Unlike previous research, we do not assume the level or growth rate of productivity is inherently higher in the coal-using sector. Analytically, greater initial wood scarcity, initial relative knowledge of coal-using technologies, and/or population growth will boost an industrial revolution, while the converse may prevent one forever. An industrial revolution, with eventual dominance by the coal-using sector, is the model’s main dynamic outcome, but not inevitable if inter-good substitutability is high enough. Empirical calibration for 1560-1900 produces historically plausible results for changes in energy-related variables during British industrialization, and through counterfactual simulations confirms that it was the growing relative scarcity of wood caused by population growth that resulted in innovation to develop coal-using machines.
Updated: 16 July 2024/Responsible Officer: Crawford Engagement/Page Contact: CAP Web Team